From e9fc7b5a7c12eeb3bffbb170d7ff8a6649f93980 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tjg <tjg>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:29:59 +0000
Subject:   Portability: the proposed C 9x __va_copy() macro is called that,
 not   va_copy(), as I thought.  Furthermore, it is defined to be a macro, so 
  we don't need to use autoconf to check for it.

---
 acinclude.m4 | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

(limited to 'acinclude.m4')

diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
index 32fa6f2..697b326 100644
--- a/acinclude.m4
+++ b/acinclude.m4
@@ -14,20 +14,6 @@ int main(void) {
 ])
 
 
-dnl Check for va_copy() in <stdarg.h>.  This is new in C 9x.
-AC_DEFUN(RC_HAVE_VA_COPY, [
-	AC_CACHE_CHECK(for va_copy(), rc_cv_have_va_copy, AC_EGREP_CPP(yes, [
-#include <stdarg.h>
-#ifdef va_copy
-yes
-#endif
-], rc_cv_have_va_copy=yes, rc_cv_have_va_copy=no))
-	case "$rc_cv_have_va_copy" in
-	yes) AC_DEFINE(HAVE_VA_COPY) ;;
-	esac
-])
-
-
 dnl We can't use AC_CHECK_FUNCS for sigsetjmp(), since it's a macro in
 dnl some places.
 AC_DEFUN(RC_FUNC_SIGSETJMP, [
-- 
cgit v1.2.3