From e9fc7b5a7c12eeb3bffbb170d7ff8a6649f93980 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tjg <tjg>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:29:59 +0000
Subject:   Portability: the proposed C 9x __va_copy() macro is called that,
 not   va_copy(), as I thought.  Furthermore, it is defined to be a macro, so 
  we don't need to use autoconf to check for it.

---
 proto.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'proto.h')

diff --git a/proto.h b/proto.h
index 82e5cb7..0f24fb5 100644
--- a/proto.h
+++ b/proto.h
@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ typedef long align_t;
 
 #include <stdarg.h>
 
-/* C 9x specifies a va_copy() macro which should be used for copying
+/* C 9x specifies a __va_copy() macro which should be used for copying
 objects of type va_list.  Of course, most places don't have this yet,
 but where it does exist we need to use it. */
-#ifndef va_copy
-#define va_copy(x,y) (x)=(y)
+#ifndef __va_copy
+#define __va_copy(x,y) (x)=(y)
 #endif
 
 #if STDC_HEADERS
-- 
cgit v1.2.3