Portability: the proposed C 9x __va_copy() macro is called that, not

  va_copy(), as I thought.  Furthermore, it is defined to be a macro, so
  we don't need to use autoconf to check for it.

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/print.c b/print.c
index 9ccccc4..f0f7728 100644
--- a/print.c
+++ b/print.c
@@ -289,11 +289,11 @@ extern int fmtprint(Format *format, const char *fmt,...) {
 	va_list ap, saveargs;
 
 	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	va_copy(saveargs, format->args);
-	va_copy(format->args, ap);
+	__va_copy(saveargs, format->args);
+	__va_copy(format->args, ap);
 	n += printfmt(format, fmt);
 	va_end(format->args);
-	va_copy(format->args, saveargs);
+	__va_copy(format->args, saveargs);
 
 	return n + format->flushed;
 }
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ extern int fprint(int fd, const char *fmt,...) {
 	format.u.n	= fd;
 
 	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	va_copy(format.args, ap);
+	__va_copy(format.args, ap);
 	printfmt(&format, fmt);
 	va_end(format.args);
 
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ extern char *mprint(const char *fmt,...) {
 
 	format.u.n = 1;
 	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	va_copy(format.args, ap);
+	__va_copy(format.args, ap);
 	result = memprint(&format, fmt, ealloc(PRINT_ALLOCSIZE), PRINT_ALLOCSIZE);
 	va_end(format.args);
 	return result;
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ extern char *nprint(const char *fmt,...) {
 
 	format.u.n = 0;
 	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	va_copy(format.args, ap);
+	__va_copy(format.args, ap);
 	result = memprint(&format, fmt, nalloc(PRINT_ALLOCSIZE), PRINT_ALLOCSIZE);
 	va_end(format.args);
 	return result;